|
Colleges of the Fenway |
Now review the main points you have distilled and group them into sets. You can draw a bracket around points to make a set. Each set will become a paragraph in your summary. You might label each set with a title to help you realize how each group of points could work together in a unified paragraph.
The Debate
Debate between Biblical minimalists and other scholars: How accurate is Bible as a history?
Minimalists argue: Biblical patriarchs did not exist; events described in O.T. did not really happen.
Moderate scholars say lack of evidence does not rule out possibility for existence of patriarchs.
The Evidence
No archeological evidence to confirm existence or achievements of Abraham, David, Solomon (minimalists say).
A lack of evidence in the archeological record does not mean a city did not exist.
Moreover, some evidence verifies presence of Solomon's military garrisons.
Some evidence points to possibility that events in Exodus occurred. Example: documentation of slave labor in Egypt during time Exodus is supposed to have occurred.
Nature of the Debate
The debate = battle between skepticism vs. faith.
The debate = clash between two ways of reading Bible. Bible as biased narrative, and Bible as framework for discovery of past.
Political and Religious Implications
Political implications for debate: Who has rightful claim to Holy Land? Jews or Palestinians?
For Christians, the Bible's historical truth certifies Christ as the one true savior in the history of humankind.
Conclusion: Impact on Search for Truth
The debate illustrates how political and social forces shape the quest for truth and knowledge.